• Yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Gods I cannot wait for her to lose, she’s a POS through and through, Dems need a better candidate.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Gods I cannot wait for her to lose, she’s a POS through and through

        I find that in general when people say shit like this, without elaborating, they generally don’t have a solid idea why they think that. Is that the case for you or do you have actual reasons for saying this?

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Not OP here and I’ll vote for her in the election 100% but the concerns I’ve seen raised most often are:

          She was a cop and her history reflects the history of being a cop. Being a prosecutor means that you’re pressuring innocent people into jail time plea deals and using cops to back up your arguments all the time. She’s the epitome of back the blue.

          That makes her a great choice against the “Law and Order” fascist felon at least.

        • Yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ideologically, she’s a corporate shill that incarcerated thousands of people for minor posessions and then claimed to be against such policies while never offering any amnesty or apology. Politically I have major disagreeances with both parties platforms. Socially, I think Harris leads to some Republican bullshit scheme.

          Also, to everyone that keeps trying to gaslight America. EVERYONE HATES HARRIS, SHE WILL DRIVE AWAY ON THE FENCE VOTERS AND YOUNGER APATHETIC VOTERS.

          • enbyecho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ah, so you sorta tried to answer this question. But it boils down to “because things”, mainly. Or rather ONE thing exactly. I’d bet that is the sum total of your actual knowledge of Harris’ history.

            Like take this sentence: “Socially, I think Harris leads to some Republican bullshit scheme.”

            What? What does that actually mean?

            • Yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Harris cannot win, Harris will not win this election. If she is the nominated candidate all it leads to is Republican bullshit and a win.

              • enbyecho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Harris cannot win, Harris will not win this election. If she is the nominated candidate all it leads to is Republican bullshit and a win.

                “Because reasons”

                • Yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Howdy, rereading old comments and came across this one of mine. I figured you would like to read it too.