• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not really. There’s no way this passes. The constitutional amendment process is too complicated even for broadly popular ideas to get through. Anything blatantly partisan like this is DOA.

    There’s some other novel legal theories (read: dumb as shit, but our Supreme Court might let it through, anyway) on how Trump could bypass the constitutional term limits, but I doubt even those will work.

    • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wasn’t there also something in the constitution about insurrection…? Yeah… I don’t think they care about it.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The issue with that one was tangled up with “what is an insurrection, anyway?”. Most of the other presidential requirements have zero room for interpretation, including this one. States wouldn’t even put him on the ballot.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m just waiting for the Supreme Court to declare part of the Constitution unconstitutional.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh they already did.

        A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.