• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For Europeans, a quick primer on American uses of the term:

    “Liberal” = socially liberal: gay marriage ok, trans people ok, immigrants ok

    “Neoliberal” = economically liberal: laissez-faire, lower taxes on businesses, fewer worker protections

    “Liberal” is left-wing. “Neoliberal” is right-wing. Sounds similar, very different. There are a lot of bad actors on lemmy who intentionally try to conflate the two. Don’t let them confuse you.

  • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    All of these seemingly insane actions only make sense when you’re preparing for a world war. Everyone is trying to find a rational explanation while ignoring this major shift is going on.

  • Maiq@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Neoliberalism is just a fascist gateway drug. Fascism Lite, all the corporate rule half the stigma. This is just the eventuality of the last forty years.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        In short. Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. And most politicians since then in the west. It has been a bipartisan policy of economics in the US since Reagan (and arguably started by Carter).

        In long form. This video.

        https://youtu.be/oWOH9iJhZXo

      • Maiq@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Words have definitions. There are these things called dictionaries that people can find these definitions in. In super short context its a far right ideology brought to mainstream politics by notable figures like Pinochet, Ronald Reagan and Margret Thatcher. Later embraced by Bill Clinton during the neoliberal takeover of the democratic party at the time when they turned their backs on the unions and people in favor of corporations and bankers. Neoliberalism differs from classical and social liberalism in that it is about freeing capital and not people. The article below explains all this in greater detail than I’m going to get into.

        It is important to remember that just because a word shares the root liber latin for free these ideoligies differ greatly in their application and meaning and history.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I’m not Maiq, but neoliberalism is mainly a conservative economics rebrand attempt similar to “classical liberalism”, which was first used before the second world war, which also lead to at least Austria’s economy crashing and then being taken over by Hitler.

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      JDPON Don is my favorite term.

      (JDPON) Joint-dictatorship of the proletariat of oppressed nations

      Is in reference Maoist third worldist literature. And is a aimed at breaking the political and economic foundations of the economic parasitism between the First and Third Worlds

      Basically Donald Trump is so incompetent that he’s bringing about a united proletariat revolution of the third world against the first.

      Which, given his isolationist policies that push third world countries to work with and develop with China that’s essentially what is happening.

      As long as China continues to allow for third world development (rather than just resource extraction) like the US has. It is a big step forward for third world independence along with the dismantling of USAID.

      Edit: To be clear. I don’t actually believe Trump is doing this on purpose. It’s a joke around his incompetence around ruling an empire and essentially destroying it from within. In reality I think he’s doing this to bring about instability and war. The war starting first with the war on the working class of the world with Tarrifs. Specifically to bring about nationalist movements in each nation.