We are closer to the 2060s than the 1960s.

This year, 1975 is as far away as 2075.

Or just start the cut in the long direction and slip the knife between the top and bottom flaps for the sides. Assuming whoever taped it didn’t add more tape perpendicular to the main length, though even then you just need to start a cut for each of them. Tip just needs to barely pierce it.

I remember the very first time I saw that was a thing and wondering why the fuck would anyone ever want that? Can’t remember if that was before or after I started the habit of disabling autorun on any inserted media, too, though I do know that that was my reaction to learning about Sony’s rootkit.

Though I might be one of the few that didn’t like UAC because it wasn’t strict enough instead of because it was annoying. I wish it had a setting where every action required permission and the dialog included the specific thing it was currently tying to do instead of the vague “it wants to change things on your computer”.

An installer is likely going to trigger that prompt whether it’s legit or not, I’d like to know if it’s triggered because it’s trying to associate its filetype with its application or trying to overwrite a dll in an unrelated program’s files.

I’ve been coming to the understanding that “bourbon” is like champagne in that it doesn’t describe a type of alcohol so much as alcohol of that type produced in a specific region (though with the caveat that there might be factors about that region that also means boubon is a distinct type of alcohol due to those factors). If that’s accurate, wouldn’t it mean that “the American bourbon industry” is redundant like “the French champagne industry” would be? All Bourbon is American.

From my perspective, as someone who didn’t have a vote in US politics and wanted you guys to vote to kick the can down the road until next time, but also understood the sentiment of those who didn’t bother, it wasn’t a belief that Trump would do any better so much as a loss in faith that the Democrats were who they claimed to be.

When hope dies, it might be replaced by despair, anger, and desperation, or it might be replaced by apathy.

And while that was going on, there was also propaganda going on where people were trying to push the idea that Trump would be any better. I don’t believe that there were a significant number of voters who voted for Trump or stayed home because they believed that to be true.

Right now, it looks like the main conflicts about this I’m seeing on this platform are those with hope trying to rally the troops, while those with anger are mainly upset at those with apathy.

The razors that I know of are rife for abuse but particularly that one when dealing with a group of people who are experts at generating plausible deniability.

They are pseudo logic.

Lol back when games were simpler, they were harder because one of the few ways they could make a game harder was to reduce the amount of leeway you had from needing to do pixel perfect moves.

Plus a lot of older games didn’t even have save points, so you either beat it in one sitting, left it on and hoped the power didn’t go out or no one else wanted to use the system.

Oh and arcade games were often tuned to let you have fun for a bit then suddenly get way harder so you’d lose and need to put quarters in if you didn’t want to start over from the beginning and ports to consoles often kept these mechanics. I remember noticing the pattern in mortal Kombat, where I wasn’t very good at the game (in hindsight) but could consistently win one match only to lose the next one, continue and repeat until I ran out of continues.

Imo all safety studies should be duplicated, with one run by someone that wants the study to give a safe and effective conclusion and another run by someone who wants the study to give a dangerous or ineffective conclusion. Both studies monitored by neutral parties that are rewarded based on how long the studies stand up for. And no NDAs (or at least no NDAs that don’t expire once the product hits the market) so that all three can be vocal about any issues they had with how the others wanted things run.

And criminal charges for any kind of corruption.

Without reading any study information, I bet in studies like these, there’s a way to opt out and be given a proven one (at least assuming there aren’t concerns about how they’d interact with the experimental ones, though I’d also expect those to be understood from the safety studies).

The opt out option wouldn’t even make that participant’s contribution worthless because someone begging to no longer do the study would be a good indicator that the pain med isn’t working well. “Time between administering drug and requesting exit from study” could even be used as an indicator to see if there’s any significant difference between the placebo and study drug, where the proven painkiller group acts as the control instead of the placebo group.

Though I don’t know how these studies account for different pain tolerance levels and different amounts of pain from the procedure, which could even vary for people getting the exact same procedure, since there will be variance between exact location of cuts and such. There would probably be some placebo group members that won’t complain of pain and proven painkiller group members that do complain (some just wanting more drugs, some experiencing pain, imagined or real, and some behaving as if they are in pain despite not feeling it).

I’d be slightly curious about why a child would make that particular dying wish, why they think anyone really has the power to either grant (if the wish is to say it without anyone thinking badly of them) or prevent that wish (if they just want to be able to say it, they already can), but mostly just lose any sympathy I might have had for the kid because I wouldn’t expect any good answer to that first question.

In optimization problems where you are trying to find the minimum or maximum, you can get stuck in a local valley/crest where one option looks better than any other nearby options but if you move far enough away, you start getting even better options.

Yeah, that’s what censorship usually looks like but look at the image in the comment I originally replied to. It didn’t say “I can’t answer that”, it said it didn’t have an opinion and then talked about the controversial nature of it.

It’s not really reasoning or analysis I’m talking about but the way it ended up setting up its weights in the NN. If it had training data with wildly different responses to questions like that and had training data that commented on wildly different opinions as controversial, then that could make it believe (metaphor) that “it’s a controversial subject” is the most statistically present text.

That could just come down to the nature of the debate. The freedom of Israelis isn’t really a question in the debate. People who see a difference between Palestinians and Hamas also see a difference between Israel’s administration and military and the general Israeli population.

My guess is that it’s set up to see contexts with conflicting positions associated as controversial but it will just go with responses that don’t have controversy associated with them.

A bias in the training data will result in a bias in the results and it doesn’t have morals to help it choose between conflicting data in its training. It’s possible that this bias was deliberately introduced, though it’s also possible that it was negligently introduced as it just sucked up data from the internet.

I’m curious though how it would respond if the second response is used to challenge the first one with a clarification that Palestinians are indeed people.

Edit: not saying that there isn’t any censorship going on with LLMs outside of China (I believe there absolutely is, depending on the model), just that that example doesn’t look like the other cases of censorship I’ve seen.

The billionaires were making a LOT of money.

Probably some condescending bullshit that sounds good to people who don’t know the full context and setting up a meeting with someone he claims will help them but is actually just his abusive travel agent buddy that gives him a kickback for all new clients he sends him.

Step 1: find phishing site
Step 2: find/write brute force script that doesn’t stop on successful login but has longer random delay between attempts (so it isn’t obvious it’s a form of a DOS attack)
Step 3: poison phishing site data

Use proxies from areas that would normally use the service the phishing site is mimicking.

Bonus step: in case the phishers use the same proxies source, make enough invalid login attempts to the actual service to get the proxies IP blocked so they can’t use them to test the large number of invalid logins to find if any are valid.

So it’s your fault they had to add a period between firstname and lastname!

Now it’s a race to get a good number like firstnamelastname69 or 112358.

Nah, it’ll be more subtle than that. Just like Brawno is full of the electrolytes plants crave, responses will be full of subtle product and brand references marketers crave. And A/B studies performed at massive scales in real-time on unwitting users and evaluated with other AIs will help them zero in on the most effective way to pepper those in for each personality type it can differentiate.

Yeah, I bought fairly recently (as interest rates were starting to climb) and it was 100% a qol decision rather than a financial one. I’m paying more in interest now than I was paying in rent before, so instead of giving my money away to a landlord, I’m giving it away to my mortgage company.

The only way I’ll come out ahead financially is if the value goes up. But I have mixed feelings on that, too, because the housing situation is fucked here and value continuing to go up will mean that the situation is still fucked. I don’t want this place to be my home forever, so if the price here goes up, then the price of better places will also go up and it ends up being a wash until I don’t need to own and can sell, but even that would be tough because inheritance is probably going to be my daughter’s only way of ever owning her own place.

Or, on the other hand, if they fix the housing issue here by limiting the number of residences any person can own and barring corporations from owning at all (or at least not having them count as new people for number of places they can own), then prices will crash and most people who currently has a mortgage will end up owing more than their house is worth and will still be fucked in that way. Unless the government makes the banks eat some of that or does a bailout for homeowners.

But anything in the above paragraph would probably take a revolution to actually happen because all of these bugs for regular people are features for those that have the wealth to influence the political power.