Cowbee [he/they]

Actually, this town has more than enough room for the two of us

He/him or they/them, doesn’t matter too much

Marxist-Leninist ☭

Interested in Marxism-Leninism? Check out my “Read Theory, Darn it!” introductory reading list!

  • 0 Posts
  • 46 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 31st, 2023

help-circle










  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldWelcome ex-Redditors!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Really? Weird. Wonder how that works, might be a weird federation thing since you’re on jlai.lu and it was a .world thread? Genuinely don’t know, to be honest.

    Anyways, do you mean your point as in people should avoid the 3 Marxist-aligned instances, or the “point” you made in your comment? I already DM’d you asking if you wanted a response to that since I couldn’t respond on that thread, I can still do that if you’d like. On top of the general disagreements about the points you made, there were some undue character judgements you made of me that I don’t think have any backing.






  • Genuinely don’t understand what you mean. Go to Hexbear, grad, .ml, whatever, and ask everyone’s opinions on Pol Pot. It’s 99% going to be negative, perhaps with some minor nuance considering the utter mess that was the Sino-Soviet Split and the US’s CIA partnership with Pol Pot. Reddit, however, does have quite a few Gonzaloists on r/communism now, and Gonzaloists generally defend Pol Pot as well.





  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldWelcome ex-Redditors!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If we are to agree with Engels, Communes (or cooperatives) consist entirely of Petite Bourgeoisie, unless there is no interaction outside said commune. Trade between communes implies each commune wishing to get more out of the trade, which implies differences in material wealth in communes that can then escalate into Capitalism. It isn’t what we think of as a State, but some form of armed millitia must be maintained to enshrine ownership within a commune, and not outside it, ergo a state enforcing class distinctions.

    Really, though, I think the term “stateless” brings ideological baggage rather than logical. What’s important is the structures themselves, not how we wish to label them. Conversations around “true” Communism or whatnot inevitably fall into ideological debate based in idealism, rather than a logical analysis of material conditions.