EleventhHour

Yeah: an idiot

“Eat the rich!” people exclaim, but as soon as they see the first step of how that particular sausage is made, they’re suddenly all vegans.

I’d be happy that Trump voters finally got what they deserve, but unfortunately, the rest of us have to suffer the consequences alongside them. As well as the rest of the world.

The more passive aggressive statements you make like this, it just confirms how miserable and desperate you are. Not just for me, but for everyone here.

Whatever you have to tell yourself so you can sleep at night….

Of course you would label yourself “main character”.

Just remember: every time you post your comments on lemmy, everyone knows exactly how desperate and pathetic the attempt for affection is.

I can’t think of a worse fate than being you. I do, however, enjoy watching you constantly display how miserable you are.

For what? Pointing out your failings? The fact that you have no friends?

Because other than passive-aggressive trolling, I can’t really see why anyone would behave that way.

Many people here think you are a paid troll, but I’m pretty sure that you’re lonely enough to do this for free because you mistake an entire online community’s hate towards you as some sort of affection. That’s why you call everyone Who insults you “friend.”

Oh, how cute. You’re trying to be passive aggressive to make yourself feel better.

Nobody is your friend.

How sad

It has been my observation that those who passive-aggressively referred to people as “friend” typically don’t have any of their own.

I’m not your friend.

Too bad the Summer Olympics are over, or you’d get gold in mental gymnastics.

Cute evasion, but nobody’s buying it.

And admitting you’re a troll and that the only reason you post or comment here is to troll is also pretty telling.

If you didn’t care, you would not have made this post (or the hundreds like it), nor would you have commented on it with your edgelord response.

Argument as populum— being popular does not make you correct. Neither does your refusal to accept reality.

Again, what led you to the conclusion you made? The facts don’t support it.

So? That certainly doesn’t explain your nonsense logic.

Like everything you’ve ever said here, that makes no sense.

Dems are concerned she’ll be a spoiler candidate whose votes will help Trump win (and they’re right about that), not that Stein would be a viable candidate— this has been explained to you. You’re conflating the two.

And, more faulty logic:

If there weren’t lots of people disagreeing with you and voting third party, then you’d have nothing to worry about

Once again, Dems aren’t worried she would win or that she’s popular (as neither are true). And it doesn’t take “lots” to spoil the election, just “enough”.

Single-digit percentages - a tiny fraction - does not constitute “a lot” nor “popular”.

Again, your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. It doesn’t even make you popular.

How did you arrive at that conclusion? The facts don’t support it. Democrats were ever worried that Stein would be elected.

Argumentum ad populum logical fallacy: being popular doesn’t make you correct. And obviously not many really think that, or Stein would actually be a viable candidate.

Once again, Your refusal to accept reality does not make you correct. And, by the numbers, it doesn’t make you popular either.

That’s obviously not how it works. You refusal to accept that reality does not make you correct.

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/27/jill-stein-democrats-2024-republicans

Yeah, for Trump. Because that’s what a vote for Jill Stein is.

Your refusal to accept reality in circular logic does not make you correct.