I thought Libation merely broke the TOS, not violated the law (UK). Doesn’t matter, I’m on a different vendor now.

deleted by creator

Yeah, I can understand that, I empathise with the frustration. We’re good.

Can we calm down a little, you don’t need to be so combative.

Those are my words, and that was your inference. “you” was referring to citizens of the United states. I could have made that more clear. I am sorry for that, I can be a not so great communicator at times. You can apologise for calling me a liar now.

With that little distraction dealt with can we discuss the topic civilly? Maybe, we can assume each other are rational human beings, that want similar things, and aren’t out to accuse each other of random shit? Please?

I don’t know what to tell you, I’m not Burt Reynolds. You just accuse people of things whether they’re true or not. I’m not sure why you think it’s okay to lie.

I didn’t accuse you of being a democrat, you just inferred that I did and started calling me a liar. Would you like to get back on topic?

Are you claiming I am a millionaire? Can you present some evidence to that effect? If you’re gonna tilt at windmills this conversation is pointless.

God I hate that Americans have decided that you vote for the person you like rather than vote to stop the worst person.

Turns out game theory [as described in this election] doesn’t describe how people (on aggregate) actually behave. It does describe how some people think people should behave (I may sometimes agree), but not how they actually do.

If I know you rationally follow game theory [as described], I’m going to offer you far less than anyone else because I know game theorists [as…] take any win, no matter how small. Ultimatum game? I offer everyone a 50-50 split, except game theorists, to whom I offer a penny. They’ll take it too.

Dems didn’t appeal to how people actually act, and so you all lost. Their supporters refused to acknowledge the reality of how groups behave, and so you all lost. [“you” means all of America - added for the misunderstanding]

“The party cannot fail, only be failed” but unironically?

N. Mace is really focusing on lowering the price of chicken eggs I see.

Fuck me for not wanting to die to industrial negligence I guess.

Change happens very slowly then all at once - unknown, to me. I didn’t want to go down that rabbit hole, it’s 0330

I like my n100 mini and usb drives. A full fat server has little WAF when the selling point is an LLM. The n100 handles all our needs sadly.

A dozen or so LXCs. A dozen or so docker containers. A couple VMs, including a Mint VM to turn my android tablet into a desktop. They were sold as a great little home lab, and that they are.

Then again, it’s a year old and I’m only beginning in this hobby.

People are unaware of the bias of their own government. People are aware of the biases of the Chinese government.

The biases you’re aware of is better than the biases you’re unaware of.

Therefore: the deep seek bias is better than openai’s. More tongue in cheek, don’t worry about it.

I kinda agree for what it’s worth. I’m only half aware of the shit the UK government instilled in me, confronting it is good. I support the tiktok ban in so far as I don’t like any of the “skinner box” media. I wouldn’t single out the Chinese version because it’s Chinese. Edit to clarify, I don’t support an “only tiktok” ban.

Likewise for AI, I wouldn’t treat deepseek negatively just for being Chinese. If it could make my countrymen less [blank]phobic that would be a boon. I don’t hold much hope though.

Aren’t you aware of Chinese bias? Not a post about china goes by without some reference to Whinnie the pooh and censorship.

Perhaps deep seek is better because people seem to be unaware of our own biases?