

18·
17 days agoThey do have a ruling. 1935. May not without cause. Specific language is inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. So your point is…?
They do have a ruling. 1935. May not without cause. Specific language is inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. So your point is…?
Land of the free, patriots of the eagle, when my side does anything, it’s totally leagle
Is no one going to mention the arm growing out of someones ear? 😁
Hey bud, FTC, not FCC. Both woulf be bad but this might be worse.
FTC website (current 20250319)
FTC website (current 20250319)