I definitely would not want the majority of the world to read the kind of propaganda that says genocide is ok, would you?

Why would you crowdfund a propaganda machine?

Just like Reddit, your lemmy experience is fully dependent on the communities you subscribe to and engage with. There are specific communities that only allow original content, like [email protected]

Did you forget about the previous Polish fascist piss government? Or Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and there’s probably more that I’m forgetting.

No this is all bs. Democrats abandoned it’s left-leaning voterbase by appealing to their donors and changing their campaign message from focusing on combatting wealth inequality and attacking the weird antitrans rhetoric to working together with republicans (???) and amplifying racist xenophobic rethoric more by constantly talking about how bad immigrants are. And of course not to forget their absolute refusal to end the genocide they were funding and sending Bill fucking Clinton to Michigan to berate Palestinians for caring about their families and friends being killed because they deserve it after Oct 7.

Political parties are supposed to appeal to voters, not the other way around. Will post this again since people still don’t get it:

Directing the attention towards the voters instead of the democratic party is a deliberate tactic to create division among the working class. The democratic party has way more power than your neighbour who didn’t vote. Getting angry at your neighbour will only alienate them further. It’s a waste of energy.

I don’t think it such a big thing to ask that a presidential candidate supports none of these genocides?

Which generations built the landscape in which the only 2 viable options where genocidal maniacs?