It actually is. More surface area, more tasty, tasty maillard reaction
It actually is. More surface area, more tasty, tasty maillard reaction
They aren’t the ones who are undoing the achievements. The rich rightwingers are doing it. They employ a bunch of different channels, including some amount of useful idiots on the left, who are doing their bidding without understanding.
The right can do it because they aren’t bound by any morals, or adherence to decorum, or fear of retaliation, or fear of change in general. Dems are the party of moderate gradual adherence to status quo and maybe moderate change for slightly better, if it’s not too bothersome. And the left for some reason hates the second more that the first, so they aren’t helping.
You have lost sympathy for people but not for the system in which it costs money to shit.
they’d have done NOTHING
That’s not fair. They’d have elected him President
Believe it or not, bees aren’t supposed to be immortal. Dead bees on random pavements are just sign that bees exist around somewhere.
Not good would be not finding anyone, drad or alive.
No, I’ve never lived in US. Why?
I started to observe a pattern recently, when people on this platform refuse to read the text of the comment they’re replying to. It leads to all kinds of bad faith arguments.
Don’t be like that. Read the text, and engage with the text, not with what you imagined someone might say to you.
There is no The Line, obviously. It’s all decided on case-by-case basis, and decisions have to be made in context. The only thing you can do in advance is to answer the question “do you prefer momentary efficiency, or do you prefer safety” and then go from there.
Can you give some examples? I really don’t understand what you’re talking about
I’ll take ruined fun over ruined lives.
Well, eventually.
I’m very specifically gesturing at the fact that US government is an insanely complicated thing, that is unbelievably hard to operate, but insanely easy to break, that’s why people who want to use it to achieve anything generally fail, but people who want to break it achieve it with ease.
And that’s only one of the specific things I’m gesturing at, very explicitly actually, nothing vague about my gesturing.
Even if everthing they were saying was true (it wasn’t), the amount of shoplifted goods pales in comparison with the amount of money their CEOs pocket just because they feel like. If you’re really concerned about the losses, maybe that’s what we need to panic about
He absolutely was, but it is also tangential to what I was talking about
The lengths you go in order to avoid engaging in good faith talk are fascinating, really.
Oh, you’re lucky too, I made a comment in the beginning of the conversation that could satisfy your curiosity. Granted, it requires to read the whole paragraph of text, so you may never know what I actually mean
At this point it’s not even funny. Do you do this with every conversations in your life, or did I get lucky? Do you understand the theory of mind? Do you understand that you actually need to listen to the person when you talk, and not just invent what you feel they might say, and then argue with that for some reason?
You can use Bitcoin miners for that
I mean, it was one-sided conversation from the beginning. And only you had the power to change it, all this time.
Isn’t it just Oliebollen?