Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
Natanael@infosec.pub
Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
@Natanael_L@mastodon.social
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
Linux does this better by defaulting to files not being executable, versus Windows needing the downloading software to apply a specific “downloaded file” flag to trigger a notice about potentially unsafe files.
You could make a lot of the commands available by default much less dangerous. Stuff like requiring using protected screens more (like UAC and ctrl+alt+del) for enabling the risky stuff.
Also, sandboxing by default would do even more to prevent the worst dangers.
The lawyer can make any case the client wish, but not by knowingly lying to the court (note that not sharing privileged information is a very different thing). In other words, saying things like “my client’s position is X” rather than making false statements of fact. And not falsely claiming their position has legal support in precedent if they know it doesn’t, etc.
More practically speaking, to ensure their client actually gets competent legal representation they would push their client to accept them presenting multiple legal arguments and not exclusively sticking to the narrative, allowing the lawyer to focus on the client’s legal rights and doing what a lawyer should do (basically “the client does not concede on any point, but if the court finds X then we argue A and if it finds Y we argue B”, offering legal arguments to “hypotheticals”), so you don’t leave any important legal arguments from the opposing side unanswered.
Tldr, make sure that no matter what the court finds, you’re making arguments to protect their legal rights and to ensure sentencing is fair.
And when a client is so unreasonable that their position can’t be represented accurately in a legal manner without simultaneously contradicting the client, well screw that client 🤷
https://www.nintendo.com/us/gaming-systems/switch-2/tech-specs/
It explicitly mentions that switch 1 game cards works, without an asterisk. Wouldn’t be nice to state that and then don’t support the games without paying extra. The only thing they’ve stated on that is the compatibility thing from the prior link, and that specific games have paid upgrades but don’t need payments to play the original version.
(unless the upgrades are equivalent to a big DLC with significant content addons that’s pretty greedy, IMHO, but it’s still not required to play 🤷)
The Nintendo Switch™ 2 Edition of a game is a bundle that includes the original game and its upgrade pack,
Games that ran at 1080p in docked mode should be able to do that on Switch 2, presumably the console could be smart enough to run the game at that resolution even in portable mode.
Otherwise, that definitely depends on the game engine and game programming. Not every game can handle arbitrary resolution changes.
It’s all ARM with hardware from the same OEM.
Yes there’s a lot of big differences, but Nintendo certainly demanded backwards compatibility from nVidia, so any major CPU and GPU instructions which games are dependent on are certainly either still implemented or emulated properly.
https://www.nintendo.com/us/gaming-systems/switch-2/transfer-guide/compatible-games/
They’re still in the testing process for compatibility. Any change can break assumptions the developer made, even if it’s just tiny, so some games might need patches, but so far that’s very few games.
There’s a difference between switch 2 edition (upgraded versions) and original switch 1 versions. It can run both, you don’t need the upgrade (unless you want the newer features).
He probably told Netanyahu to please stop it, it’s hurting my PR now, and was shocked when he said no
It’s not really. Worldwide population is still growing. Countries which are simultaneously highly developed and not incentivizing child birth have low birth rates.
Those methods of alleviation are exactly what Trumpists are banning and prohibiting
End-to-end-to-editor encryption
It’s certainly possible, although harder. Parallax effects should be visible in a real road, which it wouldn’t be in a painting of a road.
But it doesn’t track how the image changes as it moves, so Teslas can’t catch that.
Pretty sure the roads are discontinuous in the original post too
That’s like saying using deadly violence in self defense isn’t killing because it’s self defense, not attacking. But it is still killing, just a form that’s treated differently.
Assuming the idiots install the wrong root certs or click past warnings
Passkeys can be synchronized, but aren’t intended to be exported raw as they’re meant to be used with a TPM / secure element chip or equivalent secure hardware to protect the key in use. Bitwarden can synchronize them.
Also, they intentionally create distinct keys per site, so you can’t link multiple accounts using the same passkey / hardware security key.
That’s literally no different from a regular password manager or having a 2FA TOTP code app set up for it
It literally just takes a slightly different domain name. Lots of infosec pros have been phished when not paying attention
Passkeys use unique keys per site for that reason
TOTP codes can be phished, hardware security keys and passkey can’t
A split would create North Korea 2.0