Pika

I haven’t actually experienced this. I use my JF server on my roku, my Samsung tv (ok that was a pain because you have to side load it which requires a PC for TizenOs), all my families systems, and my tablet. The only systems I’ve found that seem to lack support of a jellyfin app is my ps5 and my xbox. It’s either been on native or been able to be side loaded on every smart tv I’ve used, and every mobile device has had an app in the app store allowing me to use it. I don’t understand the people saying there are no clients for it.

TIL that jellyfin doesn’t support an actual password reset. I’ve never had to actually try. That’s somewhat disappointing.

for real though, such a dumb decision on plex’s part lol

I really don’t see how anyone in their hierarchy thought this was a good idea.

There are at least 3 other competitors that moreorless work better than plex already does, without even having a subscription.

I’m amazed they decided to go this route, especially when migrating is as simple as uninstall plex, install competitor of choice(like jellyfin), and then just specify media locations.

the only real annoying part is remaking user accounts and losing watch progress/history, but there is usually a migration tool for that

the inability to be able to rent it at a profit usually. If they don’t think they can get money out of it, they won’t want to. If the economy hits a point where the housing market collapses, chances are they aren’t going to want to risk the buy in knowing that they likely won’t be able to sell for equal amount.

Or the much faster method: the “scary” government regulating it

hard agree. I never have learned anything from a video in terms of software development… now working on my car on the other hand… many times over

I mean, I don’t use the service but, $7-8 a month that gives you access to everything versus 14 to $16 a month per streaming service on everything else. It sounds like they’re still getting a steal at a more convenient rate.

Being said, yeah there is plenty of free options that could be being done as well so there is that argument

Look at it this way. there is very little that you can do about it at the time being. It makes zero sense to hard focus on the bad things in life, even more-so when they are out of your control.

Enjoy the small things, and when the possibility to make the change you want arises again, then you can focus on the bad. Until then cheer up, live a little. Don’t let the cloud saturate your personality or mind.

Good. This needs to be done. So many officials are just “resigning” as a sign of mutual respect as that is what is considered the norm, but honestly they should just wait it out (and if fired fight it out if there is legal recourse like this to do so), there’s zero reason to keel over and let federal services get demolished out of moral obligations.

If this movement becomes a thing, its about time.

It seems like it’s been over 8 years of this aim high swing low BS where only the democrats are willing to settle for less where the republicans block anything that remotely hurts them, and if they are finally coming to terms that taking the moral high ground doesn’t work when a side isn’t willing to cooperate then good for them. I had lost faith that they actually had the moral compass to allow for it.

It looks like that is how they’re currently implementing it, they are sending to the providers as well but this is how they’re doing it with the app itself currently. So you are correct if you’re using anything that isn’t Google messages currently it doesn’t do anything

I’m expecting this technology to eventually evolve to have a setting where it detects if the person you’re sending to is currently on a technology that supports it and will warn you, like how the RCS system currently Works

I have an unpopular opinion in this it seems.

Like to me it’s an obvious feature, the ability to delete after sending is standard on every other IM style tech out there. It makes sense RCS will have it as well.

Just from a comvienence point of view it would be amazing to have. Talked to them in person? OK I’ll delete this since o longer needed. Sent the wrong item? I’ll just delete it. Autocorrect fucked up and sent something atrocious to your significant other? Believe it or not, delete and try again.

Sure it could have issues with preserving court evidence but, they could also just screenshot or have something that logs messages.

Also looking at the implementation it looks like it’s still going to show evidence that something was deleted much like how Facebook has it, where it says a message was deleted so it can still be used as this is where the evidence was, but they deleted it.

And judging by the fallback message shown, it’s also entirely possible that it will be a setting much like how the RCS setting is, where you can toggle if it deletes or not.

Yeah I’ve always found it weird, like anyone’s going to actually listen to that if they’re scraping it for content

deleted by creator

they already tried that, it failed 19-20 to get the votes required to subpoena.

honestly countries affected should just go the nuclear route and embargo the US. in retaliation. Canada especially.

Yes it will fuck both sides, but it’ll get the point across these tariffs are stupid

That’s understandable I forgot about work/student non-immigrant visa’s, these still fall under a legal visa, I don’t understand why people with legal visas are being the target. They are in the country legally, there shouldn’t be any grounds for deportation for those. Being said after looking into it, it doesn’t seem like they need a reason to deport valid visa holders, which is screwed up honestly.

I did a little research on this, and this is insane. The current legal code (8 USC 1201(i)) states

After the issuance of a visa or other documentation to any alien, the consular officer or the Secretary of State may at any time, in his discretion, revoke such visa or other documentation.

and to top it off, it also contains at the end

There shall be no means of judicial review (including review pursuant to section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision, and sections 1361 and 1651 of such title) of a revocation under this subsection, except in the context of a removal proceeding if such revocation provides the sole ground for removal under section 1227(a)(1)(B) of this title.

This sounds like it means that if there is any type of other thing happening (such as an accusation that you broke the law or are here illegally), they can just say “ok visa revoked get out” with very limited possibility to a legal review

I can understand that being the case for actual criminals but, that seems super extreme.

Being said though, 9 FAM 403.11 is the declassified guidelines that it seems officials are supposed to use, and those state:

• (1) Unavailable
• (2) (U) The individual is not eligible for the visa classification (this includes ineligibility under INA 214(b));
• (3) (U) The visa has been physically removed from the passport in which it was issued; or
• (4) (U) The individual is subject to an IDENT Watchlist record in System Messages for an arrest or conviction of driving under the influence, driving while intoxicated, or similar arrests/convictions (DUI) that occurred within the previous five years, pursuant to 9 FAM 403.11-5(B) paragraph c, below.

Overall, that’s fucked.

I may be optimistic, it didn’t seem to be that way prior to the US election cycle, then again though, there were less people at that time.

So does this mean that there are 20,000 Koreans listed that are registered for citizenship but are just stuck in processing, and the remaining 120,000 are here illegally? If so I can see why they are deporting the 120,000 but, I don’t understand why they are deporting the 20,000 as if they are here legally they should have visas showing their status of being here.