

I guess it’s very “on brand” for the devs of a privacy project to be extremely paranoid.
I guess it’s very “on brand” for the devs of a privacy project to be extremely paranoid.
For OS comparission
It’s worth noting that graphene doesn’t have automatic calls recording, and the Devs have been weirdly aggressive about deleting and banning people that ask for it.
Probably a Huawei.
It’s possibly classed as fair use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc.
Meta also allegedly modified settings “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur,”
Big tech taking without giving back to the community once again.
I was thinking how often it’s used for business purposes. (There’s already case law about emojis)
The only half reasonable argument I’ve seen is that requiring pasteurisation (supposedly) makes it difficult for small dairy farms that want to sell direct to consumer, and forces them to sell to large milk companies for a far lower price. I have no idea how valid that argument is.
It’s surprising it doesn’t happen more often.
They send out review copies to “journalists” months in advance, all it takes is one of them to have poor opsec.
It sounds ridiculous but then I wonder if trump could resist the offer of a knighthood.