I’ve come to learn that when they say “small government” they don’t mean that what the government touches is small and focused. They mean that the size is physically small but have the same, if not more, power than a large government body.
Basically they want fascism and a monarchy.
They’ll also have their debt grow threefold and say the economy is doing better than ever.
In addition any paralegals will generally follow the lawyer they work with, so if a single lawyer quits you end up losing a lot of workforce.
Many of us didn’t. In fact, many people didn’t vote for anybody, and that was a major part of the problem. These people, usually single issue voters, thought they had the moral high ground by not voting between bad and worst.
Trump received the same number of votes as last election, but Harris received significantly less than Biden did last election. Harris wasn’t good enough for a lot of Democrats, and they thought not voting and letting Trump win was better than tossing their morals aside on a single issue.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation
Here you go.
The argument is not about what is but what should be.
Can we charge lawmakers with homicide for trying to kill poor people?
I posted this in a different post, but why should I pay taxes if I have no representation?
Single issue voters got us to where we are today, and I genuinely think they do more harm than the cult itself.
He has white skin and is rich.
From the way the DNC and single issue voters have been acting these past 8 years it seems like everyone wanted this to happen. I can’t possibly explain how else they could have dropped the ball so hard.
The irony being you have to be a complete idiot to be on the side that thinks withholding, dismantling, or removing education is a good idea. Wanting to change the curriculum is one thing. Dismantling it just makes you look evil. There is no positive light you could possibly put this in.
There were still claims of fraud.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say it is a surefire sign they are circling the drain, but I would agree the RTO mandates are vanity decisions. If not the vanity angle it screams that the leadership does not trust their employees or they don’t want to invest in the architecture required to make WFH feasible.
Realistically the mandates are due to tax breaks that the company gets for having a certain number of seats filled each day since these employees have a chance at fueling the local economy by eating out or getting gas.
Either way it is a bad look.
This guy has tanked all of his previous enterprises due to his poor decision making and lack of knowledge. What in their right minds made them think this would be any different?
If you are told to vote between a rock and four piles of fresh dog poop you are obviously going to vote for the rock.
The DNC is at fault for making the voters choose between a rock and four piles of fresh dog poop.
At this rate he will never be able to vote.
By the end I completely forgot he was talking about San Francisco, and I think that is the point.
And there it is.