Assuming the US can recover…

Not always, right? Like if there is a short squeeze.

Too many people shorting?

It could be true, but maybe not. If we are talking about dating, sure. Men are more likely to swipe right on women than the other way around. But how about marriage or longer term relationships? If you were 18, would you be willing to marry a poor, fat, ugly 29-year-old “independent” women who smokes with kids?

I agree with you. Some people will see this as confirmation that women all are attracted to the same guy implying the same doesn’t happen with men too. It’s worth pointing out the opposite is true. Guys of all ages fawn after the 19-24 year old, conventionally attractive women, too.

Reddit has it’s problems, sure, but I just feel like the fediverse is a fresh of breath air.

Party of crime and disorder

You said this much better than I did. One of the reasons why Democrats are called liberals.

Oh yeah, I think I was confusing in my response. I should have said:

All libertarian parties both in and outside of the United States don’t ascribe to your interpretation of the theory of libertarianism.

I included Australia as an example, but here is Canada’s platform as well.

https://libertarian.on.ca/platform/2011/environment Agreements among neighbours would be another factor that would replace top-down regulations.

I wish this were true, but what you are describing is more akin to the Democratic party’s platform. Laws by the Democratic party are passed so people and companies don’t violate the principle of non-aggression. For example, besides climate change, regulation on banking is to prevent banking from taking people’s money and just going out of business.

The Libertarian party doesn’t support the principle of non-aggression in practice. By this definition, the Democratic party would be the true libertarians or liberals.

For example:

Australia: https://www.libertarians.org.au/wa_platform

Ending Climate Alarmism Policies: Repeal state laws and subsidies tied to net-zero targets. Let the free market decide the energy mix.

And like you said, the US one too: https://lp.org/environment-energy-resources/

When governments try to tackle environmental issues (which is hypocritical, as governments are the largest polluters), they use a punishing approach that rarely, if ever, solves the problem

It means Elon gets free speech, not any of us. Elon is free to threaten a Judges daughter with no ramifications.

Anyone who is a libertarian is unfamiliar with game theory. Some problems happen when individual people act in their own self-interest, but the collective outcome is harmful. Climate change is a prime example.

Let’s just send the gold to North Korea and skip the middleman. /s

This is just about corruption in the government. It’s easier to just pass the law that makes it legal.

Thank goodness we are deporting people close to retirement so they can spend their money in Colombia and not here in the US. Great for the economy. \s

Resign? They should be in jail. They used signal to get around FOIA laws.

Maybe people burning Tesla’s are all learning lessons, too.

This is literally the whole point of the government. To impose a law that helps everyone so the person who breaks the law doesn’t get rewarded.

So now everyone is going to suffer.

Oh you looked at a violent post? Double banned.

You have been banned from Reddit.