Tarquinn2049

Who is “we”? I have nothing to do with the states.

And yes, those wars were indeed still gonna continue happening at that moment in time, no matter who got elected. And some of those words I typed were links you maybe didn’t click, cuz they very much do refute your points. And include how many wars he wound down and/or ended during his time.

Yes, USA has kind of sucked for a long time, it’s starting to very suck now.

It sounds like you were the one checked-out, I guess if news isn’t fed to you, you have no idea how to find out what happened.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2017/01/03/obamas-top-50-accomplishments-revisited/

His presidency did largely coincide with the timing of when drone strikes were starting to be possible to do.

https://www.businessinsider.com/president-obamas-super-aggressive-drone-war-in-one-graphic-2013-12

Would it be better to have used soldiers or missiles for those attacks instead? If you had the choice between sending people to do that job and some of them dying, or sending expensive missiles and killing a bunch of extra people, what’s the downside of drones comparatively?

Really, the main downside of his presidency is that he did such a good job, it pissed off racist people.

I certainly didn’t specifically mean you as an individual. But I have a hard time believing you actually thought I did…

Obama was “boring”, that is exactly what you want in a president. Just sitting there doing his job, not trying to get on TV or the news every damn day.

Although if you did want to look closer, he was very engaging to listen to. So, not boring in that sense.

The “feature” they are looking for is that it deletes itself, despite that also being illegal. They don’t want records of anything to last because when you are doing illegal stuff, records come back to bite you eventually.

They are using exactly the right app for the features they want.

The real app they are supposed to be using archives it like everything is legally supposed to be handled. For the express purpose of accountability and eventual transparency.

A witch hunt is when you don’t know for sure if anyone did anything wrong. Not when you have physical evidence of exactly who did exactly what wrong. That’s just a “case” then.

And they’ll keep at it until the weather people stop making up that it’s getting hotter. If they would just say “everything is ok, the weather is fixed now, we can go back to making money without feeling guilty” then they would stop getting fired. Easy problem to solve.

/s of course…

Wish there was just a store that covered all the fads all the time. We all know they are going to keep cycling around, why not let some of us pick a spot on the wheel to stay in forever. Instead of having to wait for it to come back in style and stock back up then.

Small metaphorically, petty, jealous, compensatory.

Perfect.

Yeah, “well, there were other meetings going on which had to end first” and “there was absolutely no wait time at all”…

I think I can discern what he meant but couldn’t articulate, but if we have to interpret what a more capable person would have said any time the president speaks…

But since we do have to interpret what he must have meant, my interpretation is that he was trying to say “there was reasonable justification for the wait time, it wasn’t artificially increased as a power-play”. Though a counter argument would be, that is exactly how a power play of artificially increasing wait times is accomplished. Instead of scheduling stuff so that people will be met with at a reasonable time given their circumstances, things are shuffled around to make the person unsure when they are supposed to go in. Enough so that they can’t leave cuz it could be any minute, but long enough that they should feel slighted. 2 hours would be a pretty ridiculous slight. Making someone spend 8 hours in your lobby without leaving is overkill. That means the whole time they kept assuring him it would be soon. At no point did they give him any heads up that he could maybe safely go to lunch or dinner or whatever since it wasn’t gonna be “that” soon.

For these meetings, it is generally considered a normal level of respect for the meeting to occur within an hour of the plane landing. Especially for someone who should be incredibly busy and scheduled to have other meetings in other countries that same day.

8 hours is fully, literally, toying with him. 100% showing how little they respect him and who he represents. 3 or 4 hours would have accomplished a complete and utter embarrassment… they wanted to set a record, just for fun.

Some of the letters are printed in colors almost as scary as the colors of a rainbow. That’s the only “offensive to idiots” thing I can possibly come up with.

The worst part… they think that’s what they did with Elon… they are just so dumb that he seems smart to them. More of a problem with idiocracy, dumb people can’t actually identify smart people. They call it luck…

What he means by “if he was in charge there wouldn’t have been a war” is that he would have made sure Ukraine couldn’t defend itself. It wouldn’t have been called a war cuz Russia would have just taken it.

This constant “asking the crowd if he is doing a dumb” kind of feels like on idiocracy, during monday night rehabilitation when the executioner is at first seemingly pandering to the crowd, and then you start to realise he actually needs their help to find Not Sure.

deleted by creator

Yeah, kind of an empty threat. It’s just picking who gets to start not having federal funding first.

And the only way to make the protests “illegal” is to seed fake violence into them.

It’s just step one on a list of steps to get to schools not having any federal funds slow enough that people don’t get enough “up in arms” to actually stop it.

They know liberals have to be pushed pretty hard to actually be violent, so they are pushing 90% as hard as that, but constantly.

Wanting to be dead is usually a temporary goal. Not always, but usually. It’s unfortunate that with this situation, there was no way to find out if it was a temporary wish this time.

I can’t make it be -5 before I posted based on what I posted. Your edit obviously clarified what it meant for most people and turned around your negative. I’m not trying to be a jerk, I am literally defending myself from you.

Whether you knew what your post should have meant or not, it was obviously not clear, I wasn’t the only person who read it the way I did. Why did you feel the need to edit it?

This isn’t actually a big deal. I’m ok that it happened. Don’t worry about it.

Edit: I will add that there is a reason it’s a common practice to put “edit:” in front of any edit that might change the context of a post, especially if there are already replies to it at the time that will change their meaning with that edit.