You have officially made my saved comment list.

You ______ when the Streisand Effect just isn’t enough.

will now be forever engrained in my lexicon.

Yea that misplaced modifier was a doozy.

“I don’t think what we just witnessed in terms of economic policy and tariffs is going to be good for America, but that’s a specific policy,” Obama said in his remarks at Hamilton College in New York. “I’m more deeply concerned with a federal government that threatens universities if they don’t give up students who are exercising their right to free speech,” he said.

Many countries do this to bring in wealthy investors. In those countries there are requirements to invest in local economy, not sure about this one.

The wealthy use these to travel every couple of month, allowing them to skip residency taxes by never being anywhere long enough.

However a US one is just dumb, because US tax laws are one of the only ones that will tax you, as a resident, when you are not in the US. So the types of people who typically buy these won’t go near it.

On the other hand if…

… the federal government can prove …

California is promising…

Of anyone in government was good at proving backhanded deals without exposing their own, we’d be in a very different place right now.

The article states California is negotiating with other countries to exclude California from those countries’ retaliatory tarrifs on US goods.

There’s nothing the federal government can do about that.

Oops, my bad.

And he could delay the trial since it impacts his campaign.

I 1000% expected the Undertaker to cameo the end of this.

Chuck?

Oh yea, dont debate any of that. I wasn’t saying this wasn’t a 100% show of feces.

Article was corrected to 20 minutes.

@[email protected] @[email protected]

Edit: never mind, context was added between 20 and 10 minutes, but that context is informative about their interaction.

White House officials took the unusual step of ordering a stop to the background check investigations after they deemed the process too intrusive, sources said.

The procedure typically involves extensive interviews as well as a review of financial records, foreign contacts, past employment, and any potential security risks.

Yup.

“That niche, that space in bourbon is a pretty specialized product. They can try and fill it but they can’t do it in any legitimate way and call it bourbon, it would be illegal,” Bricker said.

Uhh. Tell that to Cheddar, Moz, Champagne… And a million other protected trademarks that the US has just used.

Canada can put fermented maple syrup in a bucket and call it bourbon if they want to.

It’s only been what, 6 weeks? Feels like an eternity.

When it’s not a paywall, and a paper is telling true and good news, I ask everyone, please use the original link vs archive. Its the only way they know its worth writing more of.

The EPA 100% has a spreadsheet showing which pollutants lead up to those “end results”. Hopefully a swath of specific limitations comes out very, very, quickly.

Guess you haven’t seen https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39116529

Yea, I think @[email protected] was looking for malaphor

Note: I did not know this, but I wanted to see if there was a correct word for it so I dug.

Noooo this is the only fabric store around me