The department of education is the federal department. Most people in education work for the states

Need to pick a candidate who’s already quite conservative. Nobody believed that Harris was that because she ran on a liberal platform in 2020

We’re not trying to flip Republican voters. We’re trying to get low-information voters to vote for us. The undecided, unaffiliated, etc. They just come out and vote based on feels.

The government runs schools that have teams, so it can control this

Oh, because it worked so great last election. Tell me, how man seats for the Democrats pick up?

That’s how you lose elections. You just say “x issue is not that important” and wonder why voters who think it’s important don’t vote for you

The guy who ruined San Francisco got the credentials to ruin California. Now he’s gearing up to ruin what’s left of the country

They were offered a two state solution and rejected it. Whose fault is that?

They have a right to defend themselves when they are being attacked. They fucked around and are in the process of finding out. They don’t have any right to defense when attacking first.

It’s really simple. Russia attacked Ukraine so when Ukraine occupied Kursk, Russia has zero right to complain.

Yes, they should defend themselves, but if we sell (not give away) weapons, I don’t see anything wrong with that. I’m not saying we should defend Israel with American troops, but Israel has a right to exist and procure weapons

Then don’t give it to them for free

They attacked Israel

I don’t think we should give away weapons to Israel, but why should sales be blocked? Israel has a right to defend itself.

Yes, I put everything on my credit card and get miles I can use to fly business class. I have credit card debt at all times, I’m just paying off last month’s expenditures on time so I don’t pay interest

Yes, I understand that part, I’m saying you first need to first define tolerance to negate it.

By your definition, in a tolerant society I have the right to exercise free speech. I’m not shielded from consequences of my actions, for example if it’s libel. I can say anything I want about your business, but it is not true and it causes damages I’m liable for the damages.

By saying I don’t have the right to express my political opinions you’re being intolerant by your definition since you don’t believe I should be able to live free, correct?

You can’t define intolerance by defining tolerance as being intolerant of intolerance. You just made a loop

How is it a clear criteria? You haven’t defined what you mean by intolerance

Doesn’t change anything. From one perspective no crime was committed because nobody was being intolerant, but from another perspective someone was.

You can apply it to many statements, like “There should be no state in the Middle East for Jews”

That could be intolerant or maybe not.

There’s a huge difference. When there’s a body it’s obvious someone died. When someone gets offended, no crime was committed. But almost the same thing that is only offensive to people could cross the line into harassment.

Those things are slightly different. You have the right to say “FIRE” in a crowded movie theater. You have to pay for the consequences if it’s not true.

If we’re talking about posting opinions that offended people, that’s a whole another thing. People can get offended because you have a difference of opinion.

I think you need to prove either damages were caused or you were endangered by someone (damages were not caused, but could easily have been)

I don’t consider “a person said something I didn’t like” as harassment