One’s the apex king of the jungle, the other is the king of the apex jumble.
One’s the apex king of the jungle, the other is the king of the apex jumble.
I’m old enough to remember when that was the fancy new thing the kids were doing.
Oh, I didn’t realise the only kilts in existence were the ones you’d personally inspected.
The first kilt I wore (UK pipe band) was an Irish saffron kilt - just a single colour.
Why? FAT=File Allocation Table, 32 refers to 32-bit, for which the maximum is 4,294,967,295, hence the 4GB limit.
Because it’s much easier to get angry about misleading headlines. Comprehension is difficult.
Are there any specifics about this? It all seems fairly theoretical to me. What do they [want to] do that contradicts “doesn’t sell your personal data” within the context of the fluid definition of “sell”? Do they sell my personal data or don’t they? What definitions of “sell” are relevant here?
It’s all sounding a bit Bill Clinton to me: “it depends on your definition of ‘is’.”
Speaking as a developer myself, it’s likely not the devs’ fault that Teams is as shit as it is. They are all intimately familiar with its shortcomings and are perfectly able and willing to fix them, but are prevented from doing so by management who insist that shovelling crapware down their customers’ throats is far more important.
It is a fucking stupid question. I’m supposed to invent some horse shit about why this is an awesome company that I specifically chose, and simply being truthful “you’re recruiting and I need a job” isn’t acceptable.