“Any random person is probably better than Trump’s federal government” led us to trump?

That’s certainly possible. I still trust a stranger more than the current incarnation of the federal government, if those are my only choices.

If my choice is one group of rich people or another group of rich people I’ll choose the ones I don’t know over the ones I’m definitively sure are assholes.

I’d trust a random rich person over the current federal government. There’s a good chance they’re an asshole but I know for a fact the president and Congress are.

Devil’s advocate, he could have been talking about people like Oscar Schindler. I don’t believe he was, and if so he phrased it in the stupidest way possible. I bet that’s how they spin it if he gets a lot of heat over this though.

A tech bubble that will pop in 2 years and a real estate bubble that will pop in 8? I think we already do.

Nah. Intermediate difficulty in Photoshop. If I had a source image with ideal lighting and angle I could pull this off on a good day.

It’s insane how often I still see people claim Biden was fine despite all the evidence and confessions that have came out since the election.

Not to mention the debate. We all watched him, live, repeating “and by the way” over and over like a mantra and randomly bragging about his golf skills

Does it still say “hello moto” when you turn it on?

Oh, you’re mentally unwell. Ok then, carry on

So you’re suggesting we forget the former president existed? I still don’t understand. How many years back do historical events need to be before you approve of discussing them on the internet?

We have a president currently who probably suffers from some form of dementia. And your solution is “we should pretend we didn’t just watch the federal government attempt to hide that the previous president was clearly suffering from dementia”

So, I reiterate, I don’t understand where you’re coming from. But I’m starting to suspect you’re just blue maga.

Idk why those people would be mad at someone for noticing and pointing out why Biden lost the debate.

Would it help them if I lied and said he wasn’t clearly sunsetting on live tv? How?

“Biden was about as lucid as a piece of driftwood” is an accurate statement. It’s why he dropped out. It’s why trump won. Pointing it out 5 months after the election isn’t going to change that.

I don’t really understand where you’re coming from

Pretty typical conman tactic. And as much as I hate saying anything positive about him, he’s really good at it. You can’t argue with results.

Ladies and gentlemen, President Weeble Wobble

That was because he lied about it and it was a breach of family values. under oath while testifying before Congress as the defendant in a sexual harassment inquiry

Come on. Clinton was guilty of exactly what Starr charged him with. If he’d been convicted maybe it would have led to holding powerful politicians accountable and prevented someone like Trump from ever happening. Instead the Dems circled the wagons and spun it like he was being persecuted. People are still repeating that lie to this day.

What do you suppose would have happened to you or me if we’d perjured ourselves before Congress?

I’ve never seen that video until today. I clicked on it waiting for the inevitable “the doctors were blown away, they’d never seen anyone score that good, my mental acuity is unprecedented it’s historys best mental acuity” and sure enough within 30 seconds lol

Idk who’s downvoting you. It’s not anyone who saw the debate, that’s for sure.

And by the way and by the way and by the way and by the way and by the way and by the way

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes

There’s plenty of them. 13 during GW Bush’s administration alone (and 3 Democrats)

Sanders will be 86 years old when the next election happens. The dnc doesn’t need to roadblock him, the ravages of age and/or the grim reaper will do it for them. He’s never going to be president.