It’s a sad indictment of the situation that your explanation is still miles better than any other I’ve been able to come up with.

Why… was he even there?

It’s easy to be right when you’re have the power, will and utter lack of morals to do anything to ensure reality conforms to your predictions.

Pity they didn’t “predict” a post-scarcity society freed from unnecessary suffering. Imagine what those assholes might have achieved then.

…Yeah, I didn’t think so either.

Could somebody explain to me precisely how either of those things have anything to do with “DEI”? Or what Nazism and Islamism have to do with Marxism for that matter?

“A sufficiently broken clock can randomly be right an arbitrary number of times per day”.

Y’all hear that, Americans? Having opinions is no longer allowed. I’d ask you what you think of that, but I wouldn’t want to get you into trouble.

Remind me what Vance had to say about our lack of freedom of speech in the EU again?

Sure, let’s erode the idea that words have actual meaning some more. After all, there’s no need to change laws if we can just change the definition of the things they cover instead.

Maybe the meaning of ‘taxation’ should be changed to ‘racket’ while we’re at it.

Something here is “void and vacant” to be sure, but it isn’t Biden’s pardons.

I suppose doubling down on being an utter useless fool is still easier on the ego than owning up to having negligently murdered your own daughter.

So he’s a coward too. Lovely.

Respect the judiciary or leave the country.

It must be nice to be amoral, unburdened by principles, unshackled by intellectual honesty and unhampered by hypocrisy: They can shamelessly do anything and still sleep like a baby when they’re done.

“Hey I can reduce the amount of stress I feel by unilaterally make other people feel x10 as much, but that sounds like a their kind of problem. Pft. Taking responsibility for my own life? What am I, some sort of adult?”

It’s the core of the criminal mind-set: That somebody else should non-consensually pay the price for the criminal’s actions.

It wouldn’t stop Americans either I daresay; it would “just” criminalize expressing it.

“The 1st amendment? Wazzat? Does it make me richer?” – US Republicans, probably.

Yup, that sounds like Trump’s spiritual advisor, all right. On the other hand, he’s not looking to render the poor down for biofuel production unlike Thiel’s Guru Yarwin, so there’s that I guess.

I might as well give up on sanity now and save what little yet remains, by lulling myself into the delusion that Trump’s statement implies not that he’s a dribbling moron, but that he’s well-acquainted with Leonard Susskind’s work on the Holographic principle.

Shit no. Unlike the MAGA’s I’m not mentally flexible enough for that level of gymnastics, and I may just have sprained my brain. Send help.

Meanwhile, the FBI apparently has plenty of resources to run around persecuting people not for their actions, but for their environmental views. Forget neo-nazis and traitors, who clearly only wants what’s best for their country - the lovable little scamps. /s

This is my surprise face: (・―・)

I don’t, no. I do wonder how many pounds of cocaine a person has to snort to make a statement like that without vomiting from abject self-loathing in the process though.

This is some serious world class assholery.

Apparently, slashing their budgets to the tune of $660 million, will:

“…strengthen the food system for schools and childcare institutions…”

Do you guys think they realize just how full of shit they sound?

Thanks, buddy. I appreciate it.