

I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.
But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.
I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.
But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.
Consumers are the victims here. No one actually cares about their “feelings”.
I love how they just casually admit that they’re “exploring ways” to break the law.
The Constitution does not support that school of thought. It is very clear, that the rights it affords are universal and apply to everyone in the country. It says nothing about being a citizen or not.
And he wonders why people hate him? smh.
I’m pretty sure the 1st amendment nullifies this argument.
That’s a lot of fingers to count. He must have had the entire staff of the White House holding up both hands.
Well, yeah. It’s called “market manipulation”, and it’s usually considered illegal.
So, NAL, but…I’m pretty sure this violates both international law and US law.
JFC. This “order” is written like the target audience were all at a 3rd grade reading level. They spend more time complaining about how many words were used by prior administrations to define “showerhead” than they do explaining why they have such a problem with water restrictions. How stupid do you have to be, to not understand why water conservation is important…even in places where “you have so much water, you don’t know what to do with it.”
…followed by even more crackdowns on whistleblowers.
“It was a prescient call by the president. Maybe too prescient”
It’s not “prescience” when it’s deliberate.
In tonights news, “Authorities are left confused, as old man yells at, then attacks local windmills.”
So, this is what “draining the swamp” is supposed to look like…right?
They aren’t really “struggling to explain it”, so much as “struggling to explain it, in a way that doesn’t imply market manipulation and insider trading”. Because that IS the only rational explanation for what he’s doing.
Buy low…sell high. Somebody’s making a killing off of all this chaos, and it ain’t us.
Does anyone still believe this isn’t all a short-selling scam?
I seriously did not know that. I always thought they were a seperate entity. Today I learned. Thanks.
So, even more evidence of insider trading? Too bad they cut funding to all the agencies responsible for dealing with this kind of corruption.