Nonviolent protests are twice as likely to succeed as armed conflicts – and those engaging a threshold of 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change.
You need 3.5% to be consistently, effectively engaged to cause change. That was the issue with BLM; there was no organized movement with concrete demands and a base willing to escalate. A more effective version of BLM would’ve called a general strike.
A more effective version of BLM would’ve called a general strike.
You can’t just call a general strike like it’s an I Win power in a video game.
How is BLM going to feed and pay rent for millions of strikers in this general strike? A general strike is a massive, resource intensive feat of logistics with many possible fail points that takes a long time planning to have any hope of success.
Especially since we’ve not had a general strike in over a generation, there’s a good chance it would fail and sour the prospects of doing a general strike in the future.
Also, BLM was a diffuse multi-regional movement with local goals and concrete demands. Defund police departments and end qualified immunity were consistent national goals.
Police were never defunded. Some cities facing a budget crisis cut a few percent from police budgets. Often, it was a lot less than they cut from libraries, parks, etc. This has nothing to do with anything BLM wanted.
I know that was not what BLM wanted. Im just pointing out the result of populist outcry that lacks a call to action in government policy. Words are nice but they are better when they are presented as legislation for change. Like the civil rights act.
You need 3.5% to be consistently, effectively engaged to cause change. That was the issue with BLM; there was no organized movement with concrete demands and a base willing to escalate. A more effective version of BLM would’ve called a general strike.
You can’t just call a general strike like it’s an I Win power in a video game.
How is BLM going to feed and pay rent for millions of strikers in this general strike? A general strike is a massive, resource intensive feat of logistics with many possible fail points that takes a long time planning to have any hope of success.
Especially since we’ve not had a general strike in over a generation, there’s a good chance it would fail and sour the prospects of doing a general strike in the future.
Also, BLM was a diffuse multi-regional movement with local goals and concrete demands. Defund police departments and end qualified immunity were consistent national goals.
Defund the police was not my favorite. Now I have MAGA criminal running rampant and the police are infact defunded.
Get rid of trump is an easy message we can all agree on. With obvious political answers like we will remove members of congress by an means necessary.
Police were never defunded. Some cities facing a budget crisis cut a few percent from police budgets. Often, it was a lot less than they cut from libraries, parks, etc. This has nothing to do with anything BLM wanted.
I know that was not what BLM wanted. Im just pointing out the result of populist outcry that lacks a call to action in government policy. Words are nice but they are better when they are presented as legislation for change. Like the civil rights act.
Illiteracy is the primary problem here.