• Anonymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s the deal with VPNs? I noticed many instances don’t work over VPN but didn’t know where to ask.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m deeply concerned about their anticrypto discussion stance. Digital fungible money is a key component of any privacy discussion.

    Many privacy focused services accept payments in crypto, such as vpns, web hosting, email services, etc

    Not being able to discuss this axis of digital exposure is antithetical to a healthy discourse about privacy.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        but not to promote cryptocurrencies themselves

        My core complaint still stands, digital fungible money is part of the privacy conversation. Especially threat modeling for people.

        • Blaze@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Personally it’s okay with me. Feel free to have a look at the previous thread (https://feddit.org/post/6950586), but long story short

          Lemmy.dbzer0 has a very good record of stability and management. If we need to discuss crypto in a dedicated discussion, why not. To be fair, I expect some backlash of any pro-crypto discussions in a general privacy community anyway.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m ok with people promoting services which accept cryptocurrencies (hell, Lemmy itself accepts crypto donations). However promoting cryptocurrencies itself is a no-no in our instance.

        Also: Crypto is a not private. The blockchain is public.