• jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      but not to promote cryptocurrencies themselves

      My core complaint still stands, digital fungible money is part of the privacy conversation. Especially threat modeling for people.

      • Blaze@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Personally it’s okay with me. Feel free to have a look at the previous thread (https://feddit.org/post/6950586), but long story short

        Lemmy.dbzer0 has a very good record of stability and management. If we need to discuss crypto in a dedicated discussion, why not. To be fair, I expect some backlash of any pro-crypto discussions in a general privacy community anyway.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m ok with people promoting services which accept cryptocurrencies (hell, Lemmy itself accepts crypto donations). However promoting cryptocurrencies itself is a no-no in our instance.

      Also: Crypto is a not private. The blockchain is public.