• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Putting aside the fact how little the median citizen earned more in wages in comparison to the prices going up:

      No, of course not. However it’s not just the games and the console that we’re talking about. We’re talking about them monetizing every single bit more and more, especially adding subscriptions and taking away ownership. In regards to Nintendo at least they still ship real cartridges with the working game on them, but any digital purchase is neither owned by you nor can be preserved without the help of hackers. They try to continuously make money while giving less and then on top of that the prices went up.

      Not to mention their patent troll, anti-preservation and fangame-killing practices. Just in case anyone wants to argue for the company being “not as bad as others” or sth.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, I expect (not really, because greed) that as companies make bank with not only charging for subscriptions and MTX, but the fact that the gaming industry made around $20 billion in the 90s and $184 billion in 2022, that they can charge reasonable prices and still make money hand over fist. But I get it, they charge the absolute maximum that gamers will tolerate, and it’s ultimately gamers’ fault.

      • anachrohack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        All companies charge the price that consumers will tolerate, that is literally how prices work. Every single thing you spend money on is based on this principle

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          And yet, Steam prices exist. Consistently less than console, and I know they could charge more and people would pay. Maximizing the price of everything all the time is the least consumer-friendly way to make money, and most certainly not the only way.

          • anachrohack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not like they’re making baby formula here. They’re making videogames. Nobody is entitled to a $60 cartridge

            • samus12345@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              If a price is seen to be unreasonable, it is the duty of the consumer to not bend over and take whatever is charged without complaint, whether it’s for necessities or on luxury good like video games. It is not necessary to use anti-consumer practices to make money, despite what capitalism has trained you to think.

              • anachrohack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I, for one, think we live in a pretty good world if the thing that drives us to complain on the internet is a modest increase in price for entertainment goods once every 30 years. I’m not going to bemoan capitalism because I have to shell out a few more bucks for Mario Kart; that actual insanity

                • samus12345@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  If that were the only issue with capitalism, that would be great! But it’s just one small symptom out of many. There’s no denying Nintendo is being very aggressive here with pricing, and at a particularly uncertain time for the world’s economies, to boot. I’m curious to see just how much BS their market will take from them. I’m sure the first year or so, they’ll sell out easily as they struggle to meet demand; it’s after that I’m interested to see.

                  • anachrohack@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    I deny that nintendo is being very aggressive with pricing here. Increasing prices once in 30 years is not aggressive at all

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My copy of teenage mutant ninja turtles tournament fighters for the NES was 50 bucks in 1994.

      That’s a $50 price tag for a “previous generation” console.